Thank you to everyone that attended and participated in our first one-day conference (we hope the first of many!). It was a fantastic event with a range of academic panels, a practitioner roundtable, a poster exhibition, and our annual lecture from the Clerk of the House of Commons, David Natzler. You can see a full summary by following the Twitter hashtag: #ParlConf. We also have a summary of the paper and poster abstracts available here.
Our first session began with an academic panel on โParliaments in Comparative Perspectiveโ. Emma Crewe kicked things off and spoke about the parliamentary effectiveness in Bangladesh and Ethiopia.
@_Emma_Crewe gets us started on talk about parliament and public engagement, how can it address poverty, Bangladesh and Ethiopia. #parlconf
— C Leston-Bandeira (@estrangeirada) October 28, 2016
This was followed by a presentation from Mark Egan, Greffier of the States Assembly of the States of Jersey. He gave us a number of insights into smaller legislatures and an overview of the States Assembly. This was a fascinating talk about the idiosyncrasies of a smaller community.
Egan: attendance in @StatesAssembly is compulsory unless you have a good excuse – and the assembly can vote on the excuses! #parlconf
— PSA Parliaments (@psa_parl) October 28, 2016
The final presentation was from Greg Power on how parliamentary effectiveness can be measured. Power noted that measuring effectiveness in developing or newer legislatures is still very basic. They are often process-driven, have conflicting objectives and do not measure long-term impact.
GPG Director Greg Power speaking on the panel @psa_parl conference discussing parliamentary effectiveness. #parlconf pic.twitter.com/vYFe3sJoDf
— Global Partners Governance (@GPGovernance) October 28, 2016
Loving #ParlConf! Big theme: disagreement is essential for a functioning legislature. Question is: what type of disagreement is useful?
— Marc Geddes (@marcgeddes) October 28, 2016
After our academic panel, we had a practitioner roundtable that included two parliamentarians (Lord Beith and Chris Bryant MP), as well as Dr Ruth Fox from the Hansard Society and Dr Hannah White from the Institute for Government.
@DrHannahWhite talking at the @psa_parl round table on Parliament in a post-referendum era. #parlconf pic.twitter.com/2Uo8wD6lQ4
— ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ (@Stephen_R_Bates) October 28, 2016
The roundtable focused on the post-referendum environment in which Parliament is placed. The panellists highlighted a huge range of challenges, including treaty negotiations, the appropriate role for Parliament in triggering Article 50, the likely effectiveness of the Brexit Select Committee, how to navigate the repeal of European legislation (and how this can be effectively scrutinised), and much more.
@RuthFox01 – if not enough time to make decisions re EU laws, then Brexit treaty could entail huge transfer power to UK ministers #parlconf
— Emma Crewe (@_Emma_Crewe) October 28, 2016
Our co-convener summed it all up quite well in a tweet:
Fascinating roundtable on parly consequences in post-referendum; basically there'll be no early election and massive & messy task #parlconf
— C Leston-Bandeira (@estrangeirada) October 28, 2016
Our action-packed morning was followed by a lovely lunch provided by the Institute for Government, where we also had a chance to look at posters at display, before returning for our afternoon panel on โWestminster and Beyondโ.
Fish & chips and apple & rhubarb crumble for lunch at @psa_parl conference! #yum #parlconf pic.twitter.com/46FuDdaBSn
— ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ (@Stephen_R_Bates) October 28, 2016
First we had Meg Russell and Dan Goverโs paper on the faces of parliamentary power. Russell summarised six possibilities but noted that their ideas are very much a work in progress. This was followed by Mark Bennister, Alix Kelso and Phil Larkinโs paper on the Liaison Committeeโs style and content of questioning the prime minister and what this tells us about Parliament. Finally, we had an interesting talk from Jessie Blackbourn, comparing sunset clauses in Australia and the UK. The discussion that followed revolved around different ways to conceptualise power and the value of trying to understand Parliament in those terms.
Questions show value of having practitioners commenting on academic work – reality is often more complex than categories #parlconf
— PSA Parliaments (@psa_parl) October 28, 2016
After tea and coffee, it was time for the presentation of our essay competition awards. It was great that our runner-up, Matthew Robinson, was able to join us; and while the winner wasnโt able to attend, Meg Russell was able to collect the award on his behalf.
Finally, it was time for our annual lecture with David Natzler.
.@estrangeirada introducing David Natzler for our annual lecture #ParlConf pic.twitter.com/cMJqmazayh
— PSA Parliaments (@psa_parl) October 28, 2016
Thank you to @psa_parl for today's fantastic #parlconf – totally worth my nightmare journey to London ๐ Great speakers and debate.
— Dr Alexandra Meakin (@A_Meakin) October 28, 2016
Excellent day @psa_parl #parlconf – thanks to the organisers! https://t.co/WB9KiP3QVD
— Aileen Walker (@AileenWalkerUK) October 28, 2016
Many thanks to our co-sponsors, the University of Birmingham, and the organisers of the conference, especially Stephen Bates who took a strong lead in making this event happen. Many thanks to the Institute for Government for hosting us.